- Apr 24, 2022
-
-
a1batross authored
-
- Mar 30, 2022
-
- Mar 20, 2022
-
-
Haelwenn authored
Update Caddyfile to Caddy v2 Closes #2764 See merge request pleroma/pleroma!3641
-
Haelwenn authored
Delete report notifs when demoting from superuser Closes #2840 See merge request pleroma/pleroma!3642
- Mar 19, 2022
-
- Mar 17, 2022
-
-
Haelwenn authored
mix: Check `.git` presence See merge request pleroma/pleroma!3638
-
- Mar 07, 2022
-
-
Ilja authored
Use patern matching to see if someone was superuser before
-
- Mar 06, 2022
-
-
Haelwenn authored
Fix test get_user_apps/1 See merge request pleroma/pleroma!3636
-
Haelwenn authored
Copyright bump for 2022 See merge request pleroma/pleroma!3593
-
tusooa authored
-
Ilja authored
When someone isn't a superuser any more, they shouldn't see the reporsts any more either. Here we delete the report notifications from a user when that user gets updated from being a superuser to a non-superuser.
-
sleepycrow authored
-
- Mar 03, 2022
-
-
tusooa authored
-
tusooa authored
-
tusooa authored
elixir gettext current does not fully support fallback to another language [0]. But it might in the future. We adapt it so that all languages in Accept-Language headers are received by Pleroma.Web.Gettext. User.languages is now a comma-separated list. [0]: https://github.com/elixir-gettext/gettext/issues/303
-
tusooa authored
-
tusooa authored
-
tusooa authored
For an example, here, zh is not supported, but zh_Hans and zh_Hant are. If the user asks for zh, we should choose a variant for them instead of fallbacking to default. Some browsers (e.g. Firefox) does not allow users to customize their language codes. For example, there is no zh-Hans, but only zh, zh-CN, zh-TW, zh-HK, etc. This provides a workaround for those users suffering from bad design decisions.
-
- Mar 02, 2022
- Mar 01, 2022
-
-
tusooa authored
-
- Feb 28, 2022
- Feb 26, 2022
-
-
HJ authored
Revert notice compatibility routes merge request See merge request pleroma/pleroma!3576
-
- Feb 25, 2022
-
-
Haelwenn authored
-
- Feb 22, 2022
-
-
Ilja authored
For some reason I had a test who suddenly failed, mix test test/pleroma/web/o_auth/app_test.exs:54. A user has a list of applications and this test adds them and then sees if the list it gets back is the same as the apps it added. When I ran mix test a day before I didn't have this problem and when I pushed code today in a different MR, the pipeline succeeded (see https://git.pleroma.social/ilja/pleroma/-/jobs/205827), yet locally it failed. So it seems the test can sometimes succeed and sometimes fail, which makes it untrustworthy. The failure I see is because the returned list is in reverse order. I assume that's not per sé wrong. You just want to know if the apps you added are actually there. I fixed the test by first ordering the lists before comparing. AFAICT (and as far as that's relevant) the test got introduced in commit cb2a072e
-